A federal trial is underway to examine whether Amazon’s relentless pursuit of growth for its Prime service crossed legal and ethical boundaries. The Federal Trade Commission alleges the company used deceptive tactics that prioritized boosting subscriber numbers over transparent consumer choice, effectively duping millions of users.
The government’s case rests on the argument that Amazon engineered its website to create “nonconsensual enrollments.” This was allegedly achieved through “dark patterns” at checkout, where the design made it confusing to purchase goods without also subscribing to Prime. The FTC claims the company knew about this issue but failed to act because it was profitable.
The lawsuit also details the infamous “Iliad” cancellation process. The FTC argues this was a deliberately constructed maze designed to make unsubscribing as difficult as possible. By creating such a high level of friction, Amazon could retain subscribers who would have otherwise left, a practice the government deems illegal.
This trial is a critical test of the FTC’s power to regulate the powerful technology sector. It is part of a wave of litigation aimed at curbing the anti-competitive and anti-consumer practices that critics say have become rampant in the industry. The agency is seeking both hefty fines and court-enforced reforms.
Amazon’s defense is that it has always been customer-obsessed and that the FTC’s lawsuit misrepresents its intentions. The company argues that its designs were meant to highlight a valuable service, not to deceive, and that it has since simplified its subscription management tools. The outcome of the trial could have a lasting impact on the rules of e-commerce.
68