The controversy surrounding Peter Mandelson’s links to Jeffrey Epstein carries strong echoes of the scandal that engulfed the Duke of York, highlighting the enduring toxicity of any association with the late financier. Mandelson’s dismissal comes as the family of Virginia Giuffre, who sued Prince Andrew, speaks out against his appointment.
Giuffre famously accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault after being trafficked by Epstein, a claim the prince denied but which led to a multi-million-pound legal settlement. Her family’s intervention in the Mandelson affair links the two controversies, framing both as examples of the establishment protecting its own despite connections to a convicted sex offender.
While the specifics differ, the core issue is the same: the judgment of powerful public figures who maintained relationships with Epstein. Business Secretary Peter Kyle’s defense of Mandelson as a “worthwhile risk” mirrors the years of institutional silence and benefit-of-the-doubt that surrounded Prince Andrew.
The public and political reaction to the Mandelson emails shows that tolerance for such associations has evaporated. The swiftness of his dismissal, once the new evidence emerged, contrasts with the protracted Andrew scandal, suggesting that the political landscape has shifted, making any tie to Epstein an immediate career-ending liability.
61